Planning 9 Table 2.2: Achievement of goals prescribed in the SCPs Total number of goals in SCP Number of goals Achieved Partially Achieved Not Achieved 135 68 43 24 Source: Information derived from the data furnished by smart cities City wise details of goals are indicated in Appendix 2.1. As observed above, the smart cities could not achieve the planned goals even after nine years of implementing the Mission. The State Government stated that interventions from multiple departments were required in implementation of the scheme and it will be impractical to expect achievement of all these long-term goals under a single mission. The deficiencies observed in the planning process of the Mission are detailed in subsequent paragraphs: 2.2.1 Modification of Smart City Proposal Though the Mission guidelines did not have any provision for modification of SCP, the MoHUA allowed (September 2018) a one-time change in SCP to provide some flexibility in implementing the Mission. To ensure that the change in SCP would not lead to vitiation of the challenge process and its spirit, MoHUA issued (January 2019) advisory elaborating the guidelines for change in SCP. Accordingly, the cities revised their list of projects with the approval of HPSC. However, MoHUA was yet (June 2024) to approve these changes formally. Audit observed that the modification of SCP had an adverse impact on the implementation of the Mission as detailed below: 2.2.1.1 Dropping of projects from the approved SCP As per the advisory, dropping of projects from SCP, was permissible only in exigent circumstances and the cities were to give clear reasoning for not undertaking the work. On scrutiny of records, Audit observed that SPVs dropped seven to 48 per cent of the projects outlined in the SCP. The deletion/dropping of projects from SCP had also been done multiple times in violation of the advisory. Details of dropped projects are indicated in Table 2.3. Table 2.3: Details of dropped projects Smart City Projects as per SCP Deleted projects Percentage As per SCP Added subsequently Total Outlay (₹ in crore) Number Outlay (₹ in crore) Number Outlay (₹ in crore) Belagavi 68 39 107 4,097.37 41 1,335.21 38 32.59 Bengaluru 18 19 37 2,665.01 04 169.92 11 6.38 Davanagere 19 40 59 1,775.09 04 838.82 7 47.26 Hubballi- Dharwad 25 76 101 3,031.76 33 1,464.00 33 48.29 Mangaluru 66 10 76 2,129.76 24 675.02 32 31.69 Shivamogga 55 25 80 1,637.03 36 474.42 45 28.98 Tumakuru 43 41 84 2,725.28 18 798.90 21 29.31 Total 294 250 544 18,061.30 160 5,756.29 30 32 Source: Information furnished by KUIDFC/ smart cities
CAG Report No. 11 of 2025 — Implementation of Smart City Mission, Government of Karnataka
Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Page 25 of 110
Text as extracted by CivicProof (at ingest, or when the investigator fetched the record). Structured records (portal API responses) are shown as field: value lines.