Chapter-III 20 • Excess payment of ₹1.13 crore was made for two projects19 that had only completed the design stage. As per the CA report, the projects were treated as completed and full payments were made irregularly. • Similarly excess payment of ₹0.71 crore was made in respect of two projects20, the design phase of which were incomplete. • MSCL appointed two new PMCs to implement waterfront development and Smart Road projects and paid an amount of ₹0.72 crore for the design phase of these works. This amounted to duplication as the erstwhile PMC had already been paid for the design phase of these works. Thus, inadequate verification in respect of payments made to the PMC resulted in excess payment of ₹2.56 crore. The State Government replied (April 2025) that the total payment to PMC is based on manpower deployed for the period of actual deployment and the total value of work executed during the deployment and was not dependent on the presence of PMC during actual implementation or submission of design phase reports. The reply is not acceptable as payment to PMC was to be regulated based on the achievement of milestones prescribed in the contract agreement. 3.5.2 Irregular transfer of funds directly to departments MoHUA instructed (January 2019) that in projects where the respective departments / government agencies possessed strong technical expertise and execution capabilities, they could be leveraged in executing those projects faster. However, MoHUA had specified that there should not be any transfer of funds directly from SPV to government department/agency. The payments should be disbursed by the SPV to the contractor on completion of each milestone as per the terms of the tender. The government department/ agency was to check and verify the contractor’s bills for correctness and submit them to SPV for payment. A tripartite agreement was to be entered between SPV, the government department/agency and the prospective bidder before the execution of such projects. Audit noticed that an amount of ₹153.38 crore was transferred to the departments/agencies in contravention of MoHUA instructions as detailed in Table 3.3. 19 Development of MLCP with retail space near Hampanakatta junction, and Conversion of all streetlights into solar LED. 20 Redevelopment of Central market and retrofit of fish market and Waterfront area development.
CAG Report No. 11 of 2025 — Implementation of Smart City Mission, Government of Karnataka
Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Page 38 of 110
Text as extracted by CivicProof (at ingest, or when the investigator fetched the record). Structured records (portal API responses) are shown as field: value lines.