Implementation of Projects and Monitoring 25 Audit observed that four of the sampled SPVs had not maintained the minimum requirement as per SCM guidelines and the actual paid-up capital of each Smart City stood only at ₹10 lakh. Due to non-contribution, Audit could not ensure compliance to the provisions of the Companies Act 2013, applicable for Corporate Governance viz., (i) non-creation of key managerial posts; (ii) Audit Committee not formed; (iii) Infrastructure created not shown in the books of accounts. 4.2 Non-appointment of Chief Executive Officer As per Clause 10.1 of SCM Guidelines, every Smart City should have a SPV and the SPV should have a full time Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Paragraph 3 to Annexure 5 of the SCM guidelines provides that the CEO shall be a member of the Board of the SPV who is appointed with the approval of the MoHUA for a fixed term of three years and can be removed only with their prior approval. The appointment of CEO was emphasized in the Advisory Number 14 dated 03 October 2018 of MoHUA as it was observed that across organisations, having a full time CEO facilitates quick decision making and better results in terms of frequent board meetings and faster rate of project implementation in general. Audit observed that the said guidelines has not been followed in respect of appointment of CEOs and SPVs were not headed by full time CEOs as detailed in Table 4.2. Table 4.2: Non availability of CEO Smart City Date of Incorporation Period of non-availability of CEO From To Duration BSCL 11-05-2016 11/05/2016 27/10/2016 5 months 20/04/2017 28/01/2019 1 year 9 months BenSCL 03-01-2018 03/01/2018 21/08/2019 1 year 7 months DSCL 19-05-2016 19/05/2016 01/03/2018 1 year 10 months HDSCL 10-03-2017 10/03/2017 19/11/2018 1 year 8 months MSCL 06-04-2017 06/04/2017 19/11/2018 1 year 7 months 20/10/2020 Till December - 2022 2 years 2 months SSCL 07-02-2017 07.02.2017 03.03.2022 5 years TSCL 06-02-2017 27.12.2017 04.12.2018 11 months 26.07.2019 30.06.2020 10 months Source: Information furnished by Smart Cities Due to absence of full time CEO, project implementation under SCM was unable to gather momentum and the effort shifts from that of a Mission mode to one of business as usual. Thus, that it would be difficult for one person to discharge the duties of two posts viz., Commissioner of the ULB and Managing Director/CEO of the SPV particularly when there is a conflict of interest in discharging his duties between the SPV and the ULB. The State Government replied (April 2025) that efforts were made to ensure continuity of services of CEOs for implementing the projects and issues like practical difficulties and administrative issues for the gaps. The fact remains
CAG Report No. 11 of 2025 — Implementation of Smart City Mission, Government of Karnataka
Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Page 45 of 110
Text as extracted by CivicProof (at ingest, or when the investigator fetched the record). Structured records (portal API responses) are shown as field: value lines.